(公務員に関する特例)

(Special Provisions for Public Employees)

第六十一条第二章から第九章まで、第三十条、前章、第五十三条、第五十四条、第五十六条、第五十六条の二、前条、次条から第六十四条まで及び第六十六条の規定は、国家公務員及び地方公務員に関しては、適用しない。

Article 61(1)The provisions of Chapters II through IX, Article 30, the preceding Chapter, Article 53, Article 54, Article 56, Article 56-2, the preceding Article, the following Article through Article 64 and Article 66 do not apply to national and local government employees.

2国家公務員及び地方公務員に関しては、第三十二条中「育児等退職者」とあるのは「育児等退職者(第二十七条に規定する育児等退職者をいう。以下同じ。)」と、第三十四条第二項中「対象労働者等」とあるのは「対象労働者等(第三十条に規定する対象労働者等をいう。以下同じ。)」とする。

(2)With regard to national and local government employees, the term "former employee who resigned due to childcare" in Article 32 is to be replaced with "former employee who resigned due to childcare (meaning former employee who resigned due to childcare prescribed in Article 27; the same applies hereinafter)"; and the term "applicable workers, etc." in Article 34, paragraph (2) is to be replaced with "applicable workers, etc. (meaning applicable workers, etc. prescribed in Article 30; the same applies hereinafter)."

3独立行政法人通則法(平成十一年法律第百三号)第二条第四項に規定する行政執行法人(以下この条において「行政執行法人」という。)の職員(国家公務員法(昭和二十二年法律第百二十号)第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員にあっては、第十一条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば同項ただし書に規定する者に該当するものに限る。)は、当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長の承認を受けて、当該職員の配偶者、父母若しくは子(これらの者に準ずる者として厚生労働省令で定めるものを含む。)又は配偶者の父母であって負傷、疾病又は身体上若しくは精神上の障害により第二条第三号の厚生労働省令で定める期間にわたり日常生活を営むのに支障があるもの(以下この条において「要介護家族」という。)の介護をするため、休業をすることができる。

(3)An employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (4) of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 103 of 1999) (referred to as the "agency engaged in administrative execution" hereinafter in this Article) (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act(Act No. 120 of 1947), the employee is limited to a person prescribed in the proviso of Article 11, paragraph (1) when the provisions of the proviso of the same paragraph applies to the employee) may, upon obtaining an approval of the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works, take leave in order to take care of a person who is a spouse, a parent, a child (including equivalent persons as specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), or a parent of a spouse of the employee and who, due to injury, sickness, or physical or mental disability, has difficulty in leading daily life for a period specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare provided for in Article 2, item (iii) (referred to as a "family member requiring caregiving" hereinafter in this Article).

4前項の規定により休業をすることができる期間は、行政執行法人の長が、同項に規定する職員の申出に基づき、要介護家族の各々が同項に規定する介護を必要とする一の継続する状態ごとに、三回を超えず、かつ、合算して九十三日を超えない範囲内で指定する期間(第三十項において「指定期間」という。)内において必要と認められる期間とする。

(4)A period for which leave may be taken pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to be a period that is found necessary and is specified by the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution (hereinafter referred to as "specified period" in paragraph (30)), based on a request by the employee prescribed in the preceding paragraph, with regard to each family member requiring caregiving, for each continued condition that requires caregiving prescribed in the same paragraph, up to three times and not more than a total of 93 days.

5行政執行法人の長は、第三項の規定による休業の承認を受けようとする職員からその承認の請求があったときは、当該請求に係る期間のうち業務の運営に支障があると認められる日又は時間を除き、これを承認しなければならない。ただし、国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員のうち、第三項の規定による休業をすることができないこととすることについて合理的な理由があると認められる者として厚生労働省令で定めるものに該当する者からの当該請求があった場合は、この限りでない。

(5)The head of the agency engaged in administrative execution must, when an approval for leave is requested from an employee who intends to obtain the approval pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3), approve the request, excluding days or hours, within the period pertaining to the request, which are found to impede the administration of business; provided, however, that this does not apply if the request is made by an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act, as specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as a person for whom there are reasonable grounds for the leave under paragraph (3) not being granted.

6前三項の規定は、地方公務員法(昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号)第四条第一項に規定する職員(同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員にあっては、第十一条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば同項ただし書に規定する者に該当するものに限る。)について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法(昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号)第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者(地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律(昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号)第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。次項及び第五項において同じ。)」と、第四項中「行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、「同項」とあるのは「前項」と、前項中「行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、「業務」とあるのは「公務」と、同項ただし書中「国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員」とあるのは「同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員」と読み替えるものとする。

(6)The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (in the case of part-time personnel other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the personnel is to be limited to a person prescribed in the proviso of Article 11, paragraph (1) when the provisions of the proviso of the same paragraph applies to the person). In this case, the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works" in paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956); the same applies hereinafter in the following paragraph and paragraph (5))"; the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution" in paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "preceding paragraph"; the term "head of the agency engaged in administrative execution" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "business" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "public duties"; and the term "employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act" in the proviso of the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "part-time personnel other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act."

7行政執行法人の職員(国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員にあっては、第十六条の三第二項において準用する第六条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば第十六条の三第二項において読み替えて準用する第六条第一項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)であって小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育するものは、当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長の承認を受けて、負傷し、若しくは疾病にかかった当該子の世話又は疾病の予防を図るために必要なものとして第十六条の二第一項の厚生労働省令で定める当該子の世話を行うため、休暇を取得することができる。

(7)An employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act, the employee is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 16-3, paragraph (2), when the provisions of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-3, paragraph (2), apply to the person) and is taking care of a child before starting elementary school may, with the approval of the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works, obtain short-term leave to take the care of the child as specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 16-2, paragraph (1) as necessary for taking care or preventing the sickness of the child in the event of injury or sickness to the child.

8前項の規定により休暇を取得することができる日数は、一の年において五日(同項に規定する職員が養育する小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子が二人以上の場合にあっては、十日)を限度とするものとする。

(8)The number of days for short-term leave that the employee may obtain pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to be up to five days per year (or ten days in cases where the employee prescribed in the same paragraph is taking care of two or more children before starting elementary school).

9第七項の規定による休暇は、一日の所定労働時間が短い行政執行法人の職員として厚生労働省令で定めるもの以外の者は、厚生労働省令で定める一日未満の単位で取得することができる。

(9)The short-term leave pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) may be taken in a unit of less than one day as prescribed in the Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by persons other than those prescribed by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as employees of the agency engaged in administrative execution whose scheduled working hours per day are short.

10行政執行法人の長は、第七項の規定による休暇の承認を受けようとする職員からその承認の請求があったときは、業務の運営に支障があると認められる場合を除き、これを承認しなければならない。

(10)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, when an approval for short-term leave is requested from an employee who intends to obtain the approval pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7), approve the request, except in cases where the request would be found to impede the administration of business.

11第七項から前項までの規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員(同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員にあっては、第十六条の三第二項において準用する第六条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば第十六条の三第二項において読み替えて準用する第六条第一項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)について準用する。この場合において、第七項中「当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者(地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律(昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号)第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。第十項において同じ。)」と、第九項中「行政執行法人の」とあるのは「地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する」と、前項中「行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、「職員」とあるのは「同法第四条第一項に規定する職員」と、「業務」とあるのは「公務」と読み替えるものとする。

(11)The provisions of paragraphs (7) through the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (in the case of part-time personnel other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the personnel is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 16-3, paragraph (2), when the provisions of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-3, paragraph (2), apply to the employee). In this case, the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956); the same applies hereinafter in paragraph (10)); the term "of the agency engaged in administrative execution" in paragraph (9) is deemed to be replaced with "prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act; the term "the head of an agency engaged in administrative execution" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegated the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "employee" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; and the term "business" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "public duties."

12行政執行法人の職員(国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員にあっては、第十六条の六第二項において準用する第六条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば第十六条の六第二項において読み替えて準用する第六条第一項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)は、当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長の承認を受けて、当該職員の要介護家族の介護その他の第十六条の五第一項の厚生労働省令で定める世話を行うため、休暇を取得することができる。

(12)An employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act, the employee is to be limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 16-6, paragraph (2), when the provisions of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-6, paragraph (2), apply to the person) may, with the approval of the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works, obtain short-term leave to take care of a family member requiring caregiving of the employee as specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 16-5, paragraph (1), including caregiving.

13前項の規定により休暇を取得することができる日数は、一の年において五日(要介護家族が二人以上の場合にあっては、十日)を限度とするものとする。

(13)The number of days for short-term leave that the employee may obtain pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to be up to five days per year (or ten days in cases where the employee has two or more family members requiring caregiving).

14第十二項の規定による休暇は、一日の所定労働時間が短い行政執行法人の職員として厚生労働省令で定めるもの以外の者は、厚生労働省令で定める一日未満の単位で取得することができる。

(14)The short-term leave pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (12) may be taken in a unit of less than one day as prescribed by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by persons other than those prescribed in the Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as employees of the agency engaged in administrative execution whose scheduled working hours per day are short.

15行政執行法人の長は、第十二項の規定による休暇の承認を受けようとする職員からその承認の請求があったときは、業務の運営に支障があると認められる場合を除き、これを承認しなければならない。

(15)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, when an approval for short-term leave is requested from an employee who intends to obtain the approval pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (12), approve the request, except in cases where the request would be found to impede the administration of business.

16第十二項から前項までの規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員(同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員にあっては、第十六条の六第二項において準用する第六条第一項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば第十六条の六第二項において読み替えて準用する第六条第一項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)について準用する。この場合において、第十二項中「当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者(地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律(昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号)第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。第十五項において同じ。)」と、第十四項中「行政執行法人の」とあるのは「地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する」と、前項中「行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、「職員」とあるのは「同法第四条第一項に規定する職員」と、「業務」とあるのは「公務」と読み替えるものとする。

(16)The provisions of paragraph (12) to the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (in the case of part-time personnel other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the personnel is to be limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 16-6, paragraph (2), when the provisions of the proviso of Article 6, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-6, paragraph (2), apply to the employee). In this case, the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works" in paragraph (12) is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956); the same applies hereinafter in paragraph (15))"; the term "of the agency engaged in administrative execution" in paragraph (14) is deemed to be replaced with "prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act; the term "the head of an agency engaged in administrative execution" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "employee" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; and the term "business" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "public duties."

17行政執行法人の長は、三歳に満たない子を養育する当該行政執行法人の職員(国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員にあっては、第十六条の八第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)が当該子を養育するために請求した場合において、業務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、その者について、所定労働時間を超えて勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(17)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, in cases where an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution who is taking care of a child under three years of age (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act, the employee is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of Article 16-8, paragraph (1) when the provisions of the same paragraph apply to the person) makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve the employee not working in excess of the scheduled working hours as long as no impediment to the administration of business is found.

18前項の規定は、要介護家族を介護する行政執行法人の職員について準用する。この場合において、同項中「第十六条の八第一項」とあるのは「第十六条の九第一項において準用する第十六条の八第一項」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第十六条の九第一項において準用する第十六条の八第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(18)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 16-8, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 16-8, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-9, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items of the same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 16-8, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-9, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

19地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者(地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律(昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号)第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。以下この条において同じ。)は、三歳に満たない子を養育する地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員(同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員にあっては、第十六条の八第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)が当該子を養育するために請求した場合において、公務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、その者について、所定労働時間を超えて勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(19)An appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956); the same applies hereinafter in this Article) must, in cases where an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act who is taking care of a child under three years of age (in the case of part-time personnel other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the personnel must be limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of Article 16-8, paragraph (1) when the provisions of the same paragraph apply to the personnel), makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve the employee not working in excess of the scheduled working hours as long as no impediment is found to the administration of public duties.

20前項の規定は、要介護家族を介護する地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員について準用する。この場合において、前項中「第十六条の八第一項」とあるのは「第十六条の九第一項において準用する第十六条の八第一項」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第十六条の九第一項において準用する第十六条の八第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(20)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 16-8, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 16-8, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-9, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items of the same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 16-8, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-9, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

21行政執行法人の長は、当該行政執行法人の職員について労働基準法第三十六条第一項の規定により同項に規定する労働時間を延長することができる場合において、当該職員であって小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育するもの(第十七条第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)が当該子を養育するために請求した場合で業務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、その者について、制限時間(第十七条第一項に規定する制限時間をいう。第二十三項において同じ。)を超えて当該労働時間を延長して勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(21)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, in cases where the head may extend the working hours as prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 36 of the Labour Standards Act pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph for an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution, when the employee who is taking care of a child before starting elementary school (when the provisions of Article 17, paragraph (1) apply, the employee is to be limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items therein) makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve not extending the employee's working hours beyond a limit (which is prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1); the same applies in paragraph (23) of this Article) as long as no impediment is found to the administration of business.

22前項の規定は、行政執行法人の職員であって要介護家族を介護するものについて準用する。この場合において、同項中「第十七条第一項の」とあるのは「第十八条第一項において準用する第十七条第一項の」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第十八条第一項において準用する第十七条第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(22)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 17, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items in the same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 17, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

23地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者は、同法第四条第一項に規定する職員について労働基準法第三十六条第一項の規定により同項に規定する労働時間を延長することができる場合において、当該職員であって小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育するもの(第十七条第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)が当該子を養育するために請求した場合で公務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、その者について、制限時間を超えて当該労働時間を延長して勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(23)An appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act must, in cases where the appointer or person may extend the working hours as prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 36 of the Labour Standards Act pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph, when the employee who is taking care of a child before starting elementary school (when the provisions of Article 17, paragraph (1) apply, the employee is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items therein) makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve not extending the employee working hours beyond a limit as long as no impediment is found to the administration of public duties.

24前項の規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員であって要介護家族を介護するものについて準用する。この場合において、前項中「第十七条第一項」とあるのは「第十八条第一項において準用する第十七条第一項」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第十八条第一項において準用する第十七条第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(24)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 17, paragraph (1)" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items in the same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 17, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

25行政執行法人の長は、小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育する当該行政執行法人の職員であって第十九条第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものが当該子を養育するために請求した場合において、業務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、深夜(同項に規定する深夜をいう。第二十七項において同じ。)において勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(25)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, in cases where an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution who is taking care of a child before starting elementary school and does not fall under any of the items of Article 19, paragraph (1) when the provisions above apply to the employee, makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve the employee not working late-night (meaning late-night prescribed in the same paragraph; the same applies in paragraph (27) of this Article) as long as no impediment is found to the administration of business.

26前項の規定は、要介護家族を介護する行政執行法人の職員について準用する。この場合において、同項中「第十九条第一項」とあるのは「第二十条第一項において準用する第十九条第一項」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第二十条第一項において準用する第十九条第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(26)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 19, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 19, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items in the same paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 19, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

27地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者は、小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育する同法第四条第一項に規定する職員であって第十九条第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものが当該子を養育するために請求した場合において、公務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、深夜において勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。

(27)An appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act must, in cases where an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the same Act who is taking care of a child before starting elementary school and does not fall under any of the items of Article 19, paragraph (1) when the provisions above apply to the person, makes a request in order to take care of the child, approve the employee not working late-night as long as no impediment is found to the administration of public duties.

28前項の規定は、要介護家族を介護する地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員について準用する。この場合において、前項中「第十九条第一項」とあるのは「第二十条第一項において準用する第十九条第一項」と、「同項各号」とあるのは「第二十条第一項において準用する第十九条第一項各号」と、「当該子を養育する」とあるのは「当該要介護家族を介護する」と読み替えるものとする。

(28)The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act who is taking care of a family member requiring caregiving. In this case, the term "Article 19, paragraph (1)" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 19, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (1)"; the term "any of the items in the same paragraph" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of Article 19, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (1)"; and the term "take care of the child" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "take care of the family member requiring caregiving."

29行政執行法人の職員(国家公務員法第六十条の二第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員にあっては、第二十三条第三項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば同項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)は、当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長の承認を受けて、要介護家族の介護をするため、一日の勤務時間の一部につき勤務しないことができる。

(29)An employee of an agency engaged in administrative execution (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time government position prescribed in Article 60-2, paragraph (1) of the National Public Service Act, the employee is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 23, paragraph (3), when the provisions of the proviso of the same paragraph apply to the person) may, with the approval of the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works, take time off from part of their scheduled working hours to take the care of a family member requiring caregiving.

30前項の規定により勤務しないことができる時間は、要介護家族の各々が同項に規定する介護を必要とする一の継続する状態ごとに、連続する三年の期間(当該要介護家族に係る指定期間と重複する期間を除く。)内において一日につき二時間を超えない範囲内で必要と認められる時間とする。

(30)A period for which the employee can take time off their work pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is a period that is found necessary, up to two hours per day for a period of no more than three consecutive years (excluding the period which overlaps with the specified period pertaining to the family member requiring caregiving), with regard to each family member requiring caregiving, for each continued condition that requires caregiving prescribed in the same paragraph.

31行政執行法人の長は、第二十九項の規定による承認を受けようとする職員からその承認の請求があったときは、当該請求に係る時間のうち業務の運営に支障があると認められる時間を除き、これを承認しなければならない。

(31)The head of an agency engaged in administrative execution must, when an approval for leave is requested from an employee who intends to obtain the approval pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (29), approve the request, except for the hours with regard to which the request would be found to impede the administration of business.

32前三項の規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員(同法第二十二条の四第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員にあっては、第二十三条第三項ただし書の規定を適用するとしたならば同項ただし書各号のいずれにも該当しないものに限る。)について準用する。この場合において、第二十九項中「当該職員の勤務する行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、前項中「行政執行法人の長」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と、「職員」とあるのは「同法第四条第一項に規定する職員」と、「業務」とあるのは「公務」と読み替えるものとする。

(32)The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (in the case of an employee who is not required to work full-time other than those who hold a part-time official post prescribed in Article 22-4, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the employee is limited to a person who does not fall under any of the items of the proviso of Article 23, paragraph (3), when the provisions of the proviso of the same paragraph apply to the person). In this case, the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution for which the employee works" in paragraph (29) is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act; the term "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act; the term "employee" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the same Act"; and the term "business" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "public duties."

33行政執行法人の長は、職場において行われる当該行政執行法人の職員に対する国家公務員の育児休業等に関する法律第三条第一項の規定による育児休業、第三項の規定による休業その他の子の養育又は家族の介護に関する厚生労働省令で定める制度の利用に関する言動により当該職員の勤務環境が害されることのないよう、当該職員からの相談に応じ、適切に対応するために必要な体制の整備その他の雇用管理上必要な措置を講じなければならない。

(33)The head of the agency engaged in administrative execution must, with regard to workplace conduct towards an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution concerning the use of childcare leave pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Act on Childcare Leave of National Public Officers, leave pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3), or other systems prescribed by the Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on childcare and caregiving for family members, provide counseling services to the employee, improve the system necessary for appropriately handling the matters, and take necessary measures of employment management so that the employee does not suffer any disadvantage in their working conditions.

34第二十五条第二項の規定は、行政執行法人の職員が前項の相談を行い、又は行政執行法人の長による当該相談への対応に協力した際に事実を述べた場合について準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「解雇その他不利益な」とあるのは、「不利益な」と読み替えるものとする。

(34)The provisions of Article 25, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution has sought provision of the counseling services referred to in the preceding paragraph or has told the truth when cooperating with the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution in providing the counseling services. In this case, the term "dismiss or otherwise ... disadvantageously" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "... disadvantageously."

35第二十五条の二の規定は、行政執行法人の職員に係る第三十三項に規定する言動について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「事業主」とあるのは「行政執行法人の長」と、同条第二項中「事業主」とあるのは「行政執行法人の長」と、「その雇用する労働者」とあるのは「当該行政執行法人の職員」と、「当該労働者」とあるのは「当該職員」と、同条第三項中「事業主(その者が法人である場合にあっては、その役員)」とあるのは「行政執行法人の役員」と、同条第四項中「労働者は」とあるのは「行政執行法人の職員は」と、「事業主」とあるのは「行政執行法人の長」と、「前条第一項」とあるのは「第六十一条第三十三項」と読み替えるものとする。

(35)The provisions of Article 25-2 apply mutatis mutandis to conduct prescribed in paragraph (33) in which an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution is involved. In this case, the term "employer" in paragraph (1) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; the term "employer" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; the term "an employed worker" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "an employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; the term "the worker" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the employee"; the term "employer (or, if a corporation, its officers) in paragraph (3) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "officer of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; the term "worker" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the employee of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; the term "employer" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the head of the agency engaged in administrative execution"; and the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, paragraph (33)."

36地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者は、職場において行われる同法第四条第一項に規定する職員に対する地方公務員の育児休業等に関する法律第二条第一項の規定による育児休業、第六項において準用する第三項の規定による休業その他の子の養育又は家族の介護に関する厚生労働省令で定める制度の利用に関する言動により当該職員の勤務環境が害されることのないよう、当該職員からの相談に応じ、適切に対応するために必要な体制の整備その他の雇用管理上必要な措置を講じなければならない。

(36)An appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act must, with regard to workplace conduct towards an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the same Act concerning the use of childcare leave, as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Childcare Leave of Local Public Officers, leave pursuant to paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (6), or other systems prescribed by the Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on childcare and caregiving for family members, provide counseling services to the employee, improve the system necessary for appropriately handling the matters, and take necessary measures of employment management so that the employee does not suffer any disadvantage in their working conditions.

37第二十五条第二項の規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員が前項の相談を行い、又は同法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者による当該相談への対応に協力した際に事実を述べた場合について準用する。この場合において、第二十五条第二項中「解雇その他不利益な」とあるのは、「不利益な」と読み替えるものとする。

(37)The provisions of Article 25, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act tells the truth in providing counseling services referred to in the preceding paragraph or cooperating with an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the same Act on provision of counseling services. In this case, the term "dismiss or otherwise ... disadvantageously" in Article 25, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with "... disadvantageously."

38第二十五条の二の規定は、地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員に係る第三十六項に規定する言動について準用する。この場合において、第二十五条の二第一項中「事業主」とあるのは「地方公務員法(昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号)第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者(以下「任命権者等」という。)」と、同条第二項中「事業主」とあるのは「任命権者等」と、「その雇用する労働者」とあるのは「地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員」と、「当該労働者」とあるのは「当該職員」と、同条第三項中「事業主(その者が法人である場合にあっては、その役員)」とあるのは「任命権者等」と、同条第四項中「労働者は」とあるのは「地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員は」と、「事業主」とあるのは「任命権者等」と、「前条第一項」とあるのは「第六十一条第三十六項」と読み替えるものとする。

(38)The provisions of Article 25-2 apply mutatis mutandis to conduct specified in paragraph (36) in which an employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act is involved. In this case, the term "employer" in Article 25-2, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (hereinafter referred to as "appointer") "; the term "employer" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "appointer"; the term "employed worker" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "employee prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "the worker" in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the employee"; the term "employer (or, if a corporation, its officer)" in paragraph (3) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "appointer"; the term "workers" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the employees prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Local Public Service Act"; the term "employer" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "appointer"; and the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in paragraph (4) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, paragraph (36)."